This is not a debate about gold or oil. It is a stance toward the pact of the word. For centuries, literature has gifted us with a stubborn fiction: the literary subject as an autonomous, bohemian person, the product of their own dream-world of creation. The term otium is heard in Ancient Rome, it is reproduced in the symbolist ivory towers, it strolls through the Romantic poet, and it is embodied in the figure of the Twentieth-Century intellectual committed to their present. If Aristotle offered a path, the oikonomía, the governance of the house, and that of contemplative life — what ground sustains the artist if their existence never stays outside the logic of the economy?
Yolanda Castaño writes from an ancient illusion:
literature can survive by living on air apart from the material condition that makes it exist.
In Economy and Poetry: Internal Rhymes (2025), through essayistic typology, and in The False Autonomous (2026), through poetic structures, the economic fact ceases to be decorum of a context and becomes the place from which the work speaks. The essay offers an ideological position from the periplus of a life devoted to verse; the poem enters the market thinking about that subject shaped by it. Castaño speaks of capitalism that produces a subjectivity: that of a precarious artistic figure, always available, always (self)exploited.
Therefore, it is no accident that this staging coincides with a story seemingly unrelated, yet intimately connected. For years, one of the most influential people in the national cultural journalism was Mar de Marchis: elegant, cosmopolitan, charismatic. Later, it was revealed that this director of Jot Down was a fictional character built with millimeter-precise tools to hide her real person —see The Ball (2026), by Daniel Verdú—: what kind of ecosystem pushes to fabricate a character to accumulate power and authority? In this current economy, even a proper name becomes symbolic capital, and it is indeed Marchis the character that cultural capitalism expected.
While Yolanda Castaño, through her words, denounces that the creator makes themselves into a business, Mar manipulates the logic to the extreme of turning her identity into a publishing company: this is a historical symptom tied to a strand of fiction. Castaño demonstrates that the market perpetuates a writer who fictionalizes their life as a brand, merging a public identity with the management of invisible work. And on the flip side, de Marchis receives the media context from the disguise of a matryoshka to access a field that would not have welcomed her under her real circumstances: perhaps the economy of labor shifts and lands on the economy of prestige.
As a culmination, a new question should be asked: what happens when a writer’s life is subordinated to the grand logic of productivity?
Necessary debates concern how many copies a publication sells, what the edition’s run should be, what percentage of public funding should be allocated to culture, and a long etcetera. In response, capitalism demonstrates, increasingly ferociously, a capacity to appropriate everything that previously resisted the market —or struggled to appear so. First, it was material objects; then the labor of work; and finally data and appearance. Now, at this moment, the activity and constant availability of the artist are commodified. The figure of the writer is no longer bound to ‘a person who writes,’ but their bearing and their image reveal their participation in festivals, their friendly conversations on social media, their attention to interviews that form an extension of their work. The result is that writing, beyond being protected or private, develops as an activity opened to obligations that, while invisible, are increasingly present in the sector’s everyday scene.
Parece ejercicio de antítesis que una época obsesionada con la producción haya opacado la estructura bajo condiciones de tiempo, valor y espacio que la hacen poco practicable. It seems contradictory to say that there have never been so many artistic residencies, so many literary meetings, so many book clubs, so many workshops and prizes, yet the deficit persists: slowness, silence, thought. Perhaps what the market takes as a dead interval is the raw material of the literary act.
Both Yolanda Castaño’s publications point to the cause of the blind spot: time. The discussion does not rest solely on insufficient income, but on the progressive and silent trap of watching how space for freedom narrows without the tools to slow down one’s thinking —without having to justify its usefulness. Economy and speed alter the rhythm with which the work is thought, produced, and received.
On one hand, monetary scarcity; on the other, a lack of time. This intuition connects with the figure of a journalist, a translator, an actor, in whom the joie de vivre is conditioned by a schedule where every minute belongs, in advance, to a clock belonging to someone else.
At this turning point, Mar de Marchis embodies identity brought to the resource. She did not present herself; she functioned as a utilitarian material constructed to meet the expectations of the cultural ecosystem: yes, the same one that consumes others’ biographies and the morbid curiosity to know who lies behind the doubt. Imagination, as we know, creates myths or destroys temples, because authority is not only exercised from brilliant work, it is projected onto personal narration: what happens when prestige equals merchandise?
The answer from Castaño adopts the tone of experience when silence defines the syntax for the reader to experience precarity from the poem itself: «I can recite almost the entire harvest straight through». The initial proposition that literature retains its power of resistance comes to a clear conclusion: poetry, in this instance, names what the economic factor cannot measure. A balance of income and expenses may not record the hours behind waiting for a thought to take shape, and thus the true debate is not the profitability of writing —let us consider the adult’s reaction when the child answers the famous what do you want to be when you grow up with a I want to be a writer.
It is a rhetorical device to claim that the same system that requires justification of a work’s value also acknowledges that fiction is not limited to publications: fiction is a legitimization element. Mar de Marchis is the construction of an alternative identity that cannot be measured by the parameters of truth or falsehood, because her story speaks to how recognition operates as representation. In this life, having discernment is not enough; one must appear —like Lazarus’s squire— as that kind of person whom the context imagines to possess that worth. Here lies a paradox: if the author has died for textual criticism by writers such as Roland Barthes, why does the market chart the opposite path? With the market as ally, the person does not contribute information to their text, but pushes it toward commercialization. The work does not arrive alone; it appears accompanied by an image and a fable.
De Marchis intuited that the tale is made and that one can become the words one says to be. It is no accident that her character possessed all the attributes that the sociocultural imagination equates with prestige: cosmopolitanism, charisma, attractiveness, youth, precocious maturity, elegance, distance from public noise. As with the great protagonists, verisimilitude mattered more than veracity. It was not necessary to believe in Mar de Marchis, but in her idea that answered, without a doubt, to an ideal.
It is not a coincidence that contemporary success trajectories are compelled to maintain active media visibility. Visibility often substitutes, in many circumstances, the sense of recognition. Before, one reached a work or a magazine because there was reader interest; now, one reaches through the exposure of the person behind it. Castaño responds to precarity as a model of organizing existence, where luxury is measured by an afternoon without meetings, calls, or algorithms.
The twenty-first century seems to find its value in crafting subjects capable of generating attention and recognition. The mask of Mar conceals a mechanism, and Yolanda’s poetic self reveals the current confusion in thinking that the circulation of culture implies, by itself, the existence of culture.
This is not about gold or oil, nor even about how many collaborators the woman from the black ball had or how many display windows house that book; rather, the crucial question is what kind of civilization turns the time to think into an almost inaccessible luxury. Two millennia after the oikonomía, the economy no longer governs the house; it also imposes the rhythm of the utterance and the identity of a person who studies how to present themselves.
We believed capitalism would end by putting a price on things and rate the duration before a product, but prestige, fiction, branding, and success arrive much later: capitalism has been pricing everything except time that does not quote.
—————————————
Author: Yolanda Castaño. Title: The False Autonomous. Publisher: Visor. Sales: Todos tus libros.